Scranton Bishop Joseph Martino issued a statement this week in answer to critics of his rebuke of Misericordia University for hosting a speaker who advocated policies and behaviors in opposition to clear Catholic teachings on sexuality and marriage. Patrick J. Reilly, President of The Cardinal Newman Society, thanked Bishop Martino for his comments.

“Bishop Martino’s statement is a needed reminder of the responsibilities that Catholic colleges and universities have to present Catholic teachings in a clear and consistent manner,” said Reilly. “Far too often Catholic campuses have promoted views that are in direct opposition to what Catholics believe leading to scandal and confusion.

“We are blessed to have Bishop Martino’s leadership on these important issues.”

The text of Bishop Martino’s latest statement follows:

    A substantial amount of media coverage and public commentary ensued after I asked Misericordia University to seriously consider discontinuing its Diversity Institute. Students and others in the community related how this Institute has furthered the advancement of tolerance, understanding and harmony between people of different races and cultures.

    These are all worthy goals. All people of good will should work toward these ends.

    Misericordia University, as a Catholic institution, has a responsibility for helping the community achieve these goals. However, precisely because it is a Catholic institution, it also has a responsibility to transmit Catholic teaching to its students in ways that are not ambiguous or confusing.

    As I said in my previous statement, students should learn respect for all races and cultures, but viewpoints that are in direct opposition to Catholic teaching should not be presented under the guise of “diversity.” Doing so within a formal structure sanctioned by the institution gives the impression that these viewpoints are acceptable, or that all morality is relative.

    As Catholics, we must distinguish between authentic tolerance and an “anything goes” mindset. For example, would the Diversity Institute be justified in hosting a speaker who believes the Holocaust is a myth? Or one who believes slavery is okay because certain people are inferior? Or one who believes women can be exploited because they are the “weaker sex”? There are people out there who actually believe this nonsense, and they would be perfectly willing to come to the campus to tell you why.

    Their views are certainly “diverse,” but does that qualify them to be given a platform in the name of tolerance? Or should they be allowed to make a presentation without any retort from the Catholic perspective?

    As Catholics, we believe there is an objective, moral Truth – given to us by Jesus Christ. This Truth is timeless, and it cannot be altered by the shifting tides of popular culture. If our faith and our actions are not rooted in this Truth, we risk contributing to the “dictatorship of relativism” cited by then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in a homily given just prior to his election as Pope Benedict XVI. He said:

    “To have a clear faith, according to the creed of the Church, is often labeled as fundamentalism. While relativism, that is, allowing oneself to be carried about with every wind of ‘doctrine,’ seems to be the attitude that is fashionable. A dictatorship of relativism is being constituted that recognizes nothing as absolute and which only leaves the ‘I’ and its whims as the ultimate measure.”

    As the Bishop, it is not only my right, but my obligation to ensure that authentic Catholic teaching is being provided in all Catholic institutions in this Diocese, and that viewpoints in opposition to this teaching are not being presented as acceptable alternatives.

    I voiced my “absolute disapproval” of Misericordia’s hosting of Keith Boykin not because of his sexual orientation, but because he is a well known proponent of morality that is disturbingly opposed to Catholic teaching, such as homosexual relations and same sex marriage. Furthermore, no presentation was made to balance Mr. Boykin’s viewpoints with the teaching of the Catholic Church.

    That is why I asked Misericordia, which asserted that it “is committed deeply to its Catholic mission,” to convey how it teaches Catholic morality regarding sexuality and homosexuality, and to produce concrete evidence. It is regrettable that the University chose to respond with a brief statement without any such evidence.

    Nevertheless, I continue to urge Misericordia University to fulfill the four essential characteristics of a Catholic institution of higher learning. As I pointed out in briefer form in my initial statement on this matter, these are:

        1. A Christian inspiration not only of individuals but of the university community
            as such;

        2. A continuing reflection in the light of the Catholic faith upon the growing
            treasury of human knowledge, to which it seeks to contribute by its own
            research;

        3. Fidelity to the Christian message as it comes to us through the Church;

        4. An institutional commitment to the service of the people of God and of the
            human family in their pilgrimage to the transcendent goal which gives
            meaning to life.

                (Pope John Paul II, Apostolic Constitution on Catholic Universities)